A new poll has discovered that four out of five Britons believe that the law should be changed to allow for ‘No Fault Divorces.’ This is where neither party must admit to a wrongdoing.
At present, a married couple who are wishing for a divorce must provide evidence of one of the couple’s ‘fault’ in the marriage. This includes adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion or separation without consent.
The argument against this law says that forcing couples through an ‘artificial exercise in mudslinging’ causes unnecessary stress, emotional pain, and may damage either member of the couple’s external relationships: for example, relationships with in-laws, family friends or children.
Ayesha Vardag, head of family law firm Vardags, has said:
“Forcing decent human beings through an expensive, destructive, utterly artificial exercise in mudslinging just to salve the consciences of the anti-divorce lobby is incredibly damaging, especially to the family, and sets the tone for battle not brokering.”
The Conservative MP Richard Bacon will be presenting the bill in commons. He states that a court should be able to grant divorce if there is “an individual statement from each party that the marriage has broken down irretrievably, signed freely and independently.”
Certain religious groups have argued against no fault divorces, claiming that this would further damage the sanctity of marriage. Others have said that it would make getting divorced ‘easier than hiring a purchase agreement.’
However, 85% of people questioned believed that this option should be available.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute specific advice. You should not rely on the information in this article. Fiona Bruce Solicitors recommends that you seek our specific advice if you wish to rely on the any part of this article. Whilst Fiona Bruce Solicitors makes every effort to ensure that the article is accurate, Fiona Bruce Solicitors excludes all liability for claim, loss, demands or damages of any kind whatsoever (whether such claims, loss, demands or damages were foreseeable, known or otherwise) arising out of or in connection with the use of this article or any other information contained on this website. Any information provided only applies to England and Wales.