Two women claiming they were misled by their ex-husbands in their divorce settlements have won in Supreme Court this week. 

Invalid settlements

Ms Alison Sharland and Ms Varsha Gohil have both claimed that their ex-husbands hid the extent of their wealth during divorce proceedings, and the Supreme Court have now ruled in their favour.  

Ms Sharland accepted what she believed to be half of her husband’s fortune – £10m – only to discover at a later date that the worth of his software company estimated to be £600m. Ns Gohil accepted a settlement of £270,000 and a car from her husband, but when her husband was convicted of money laundering it was discovered that he had failed to disclose his true wealth to his ex-wife. 

A new precedent in family law?

Both Ms Sharland and Ms Gohil, as well as the Supreme Court, have indicated that their claims will return to High Court as a consequence of the Supreme Court ruling. If the High Court rules in their favour both women could receive a higher settlement. 

The Supreme Court ruling could set a new precedent in family law, ensuring that divorce settlements have to be based on a valid agreement. If dishonesty can be proved, the other party can petition the court to have their settlement considered again. 

This Supreme Court ruling could see many couples revisiting their divorce settlements, but the ruling does not guarantee changed agreements.

Get in touch if you need to discuss any family disputes.

Article Disclaimer

This article is for general information only and does not constitute specific advice. You should not rely on the information in this article. Fiona Bruce Solicitors recommends that you seek our specific advice if you wish to rely on the any part of this article. Whilst Fiona Bruce Solicitors makes every effort to ensure that the article is accurate, Fiona Bruce Solicitors excludes all liability for claim, loss, demands or damages of any kind whatsoever (whether such claims, loss, demands or damages were foreseeable, known or otherwise) arising out of or in connection with the use of this article or any other information contained on this website. Any information provided only applies to England and Wales.

The contents of this post do not constitute legal advice and are provided for general information purposes only