Sports Direct has come under fire in the past week following an investigation into its working practices by the Guardian. Journalists Simon Goodley and Jonathon Ashby worked undercover at a Sports Direct warehouse in Shirebrook, Derbyshire and reported that its workers – of which there are up to 5,000 each day – are effectively paid less than minimum wage.
Workers are subject to a full search at the end of the shift, as part of Sports Direct’s zero tolerance of theft. This is mandatory, but unpaid. It typically takes workers fifteen minutes each to complete their search. As workers are paid the minimum wage of £6.70 for an eight hour shift but are not paid for this extra working time, they are effectively earning about £6.50 per hour.
By contrast, workers have their pay docked if they clock in as little as one minute late. This is also not calculated in proportion with their latness: the reporter said that a worker had their pay docked by 15 minutes after ‘arriving at the warehouse on time, but clocking in five minutes late.’
The investigation has led to MPs calling for HMRC to do an official inquiry into the claims about its treatment of employees and whether the company is in breach of employment laws.
While Sports Direct have denied the allegations that they are paying below minimum wage, Nick Boles, a business minister, has added pressure on HMRC to investigate the matter.
“Boles said he could not give an “absolute pronouncement” about some of the practices associated with Sports Direct but stressed that “anything that counts as work must be compensated at least at the level of the minimum wage”.”
Read more below:
Mike Ashley’s Sports Direct ‘could face Government action over wage claims’
Sports Direct denies ‘Dickensian practices’ in face of investor revolt
Uproar against Sports Direct in business and parliament
Keep an eye on our blog for more ‘in the news’ stories.
Article Disclaimer
This article is for general information only and does not constitute specific advice. You should not rely on the information in this article. Fiona Bruce Solicitors recommends that you seek our specific advice if you wish to rely on the any part of this article. Whilst Fiona Bruce Solicitors makes every effort to ensure that the article is accurate, Fiona Bruce Solicitors excludes all liability for claim, loss, demands or damages of any kind whatsoever (whether such claims, loss, demands or damages were foreseeable, known or otherwise) arising out of or in connection with the use of this article or any other information contained on this website. Any information provided only applies to England and Wales.
The contents of this post do not constitute legal advice and are provided for general information purposes only ■